Research Manager, AI Safety

About Cambridge Boston Alignment Initiative

The Cambridge Boston Alignment Initiative (CBAI) is a nonprofit research organization working to advance research and education directed towards ensuring that society navigates a safe and beneficial transition to advanced AI systems. Our work takes the form of producing original research efforts and accelerating AI safety research through fellowship programs.

Our inaugural summer fellowship cohort has already published a spotlight paper at the Mechanistic Interpretability Workshop at NeurIPS, accepted papers at ICLR, and some of our fellows have joined Goodfire and Redwood Research. After a successful 2025 launch, we're rapidly scaling in 2026. We will host multiple fellowship cycles (Fall, Spring, and Summer), double the fellowship cohort, and quadruple our team.

The Role

You'll work closely with research fellows and their mentors — renowned researchers from Cambridge and beyond — to support cutting-edge work on interpretability, AI control, formal verification for provably safe AI, evaluations, and various topics in AI governance & policy. We're interested in hiring research managers with technical research experience and governance & policy research experience.

Research Management (0.7 FTE)

• Conduct frequent 1-1s with your fellows, providing feedback on research progress and helping them overcome obstacles, coaching them through challenges such as but not limited to debugging the research and preparing literature scaffolds, and supporting data collection & analysis, as well as methodology development for the experiments & hypothesis tests.
• Provide feedback on your fellows' research and help CBAI create an environment that nudges your fellows to be more rigorous in their approach.
• Connect fellows with resources, literature, and opportunities they can explore during and after the fellowship program.
• Communicate with your fellows' mentors to define clear research objectives and support your fellows’ research progression.
• Contribute to the fellow selection process by reviewing and interviewing candidates to ensure the cohort consists of individuals with strong epistemic standards.

Program Management & Development (0.3 FTE)

• Design reading group curriculum components and workshop programs.
• Curate a speaker event series based on fellow profiles and recent important studies.
• Support special projects aligned with your strengths (e.g., applicant selection, evaluation frameworks, mentor onboarding).
• Meet weekly with program leadership to enhance feedback loops and continuously improve the program.
• Stay current on technical AI alignment or governance developments relevant to your fellows' work.
• Prepare weekly briefs on the most recent developments in the field for fellows.

About You

We expect you to be characterized by most of the qualities listed below.

• Experience supporting complex intellectual work. You have helped others execute complex analytical or research projects. This might come from teaching, managing technical teams, conducting your own research, consulting, coordinating academic programs, or providing substantive feedback on others' work.
• You understand the research process from the inside. You've done substantial analytical work yourself (whether in academia, policy analysis, consulting, or industry research). This means you can recognize when a research plan is solid vs. hand-wavy, identify blockers in someone's thinking, and suggest concrete next steps.
• You're skilled at developmental feedback. You provide constructive feedback that advances the work, rather than simply identifying problems. You can help people strengthen their arguments, tighten their methodology, and present their findings more clearly, even when the specific topic is outside your core expertise.
• Excellent communicator. You explain complex concepts clearly and give constructive feedback effectively. You check in proactively when you're unsure about something or notice a potential problem.
• Interpersonally excellent. You have genuine empathy, active listening skills, and a servant leadership approach. You enjoy helping others succeed and take pride in their accomplishments. You're skilled at managing stakeholders and coordinating between multiple parties (researchers, advisors, administrators).
• Mission-motivated. You are strongly aligned with CBAI's mission and are familiar with AGI safety and catastrophic AI risks. You want to contribute meaningfully to reducing AI catastrophic risks and are passionate about accomplishing as much as possible.
• Organized and conscientious. You keep complex projects on track, follow through reliably, and maintain clear communication. You're receptive to feedback and continuously improve your approach based on what you learn.
• Curious and adaptable. You're excited to learn about diverse research agendas and work with researchers from varied backgrounds. You actively seek out tools and approaches that can improve fellowship effectiveness.

The ideal candidate for this position will possess most of the qualities described above and will have a bachelor's degree or higher in Computer Science, Mathematics, Statistics, Economics, Public Policy, Political Science, or a related field, with research experience demonstrating strong methodological knowledge and a genuine interest in building a career in AI safety research.

Nice to Haves

• Previous involvement in AI safety/alignment programs or similar field-building initiatives.
• Published research in interpretability, AI control, or adjacent agendas.
• Experience managing research programs or academic initiatives.

Why This Role May Not Be the Right Fit

We want to be transparent about what this position entails so you can make an informed decision about whether it's right for you:

• You're supporting others' research. Your primary job is helping fellows execute _their_ research projects, not shaping their research strategy. You'll coach fellows through challenges, provide feedback, and connect them with resources, but you won't set research directions or objectives; mentors and fellows own that. In some cases, with mentor and fellow approval, you may contribute substantially enough to merit co-authorship, but this is a facilitation role first and foremost.
• Your success is measured by fellows' accomplishments. When fellows publish papers, secure positions at top labs, or advance in their careers, that's your win. If you're primarily motivated by building your own research reputation or publication record, this role won't be satisfying.
• Workload varies significantly by fellowship cycle. Active fellowship periods are intense; between cycles, the pace slows considerably. If you strongly prefer steady, predictable work.